The perils of online dating
Jan. 3rd, 2013 08:01 amKind of on a whim, I started an OK Cupid profile. For some reason, the first line of my profile -- "I am an opinionated left-wing feminist Catholic nerd" - puts people off. I just got this message:
That's a full on first line: opinionated left-wing feminist Catholic nerd.
Definitely not for me ma chérie.
So far I've resisted the urge to reply, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED", or pointing out that he needs a comma after "me", or, indeed, replying at all.
The whole point of that first line is that in my experience with online dating, I tend to make contact with seemingly nice men, and we bond over our left-wing politics and feminism and nerdery, and then they start telling me how great Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are. And then there's the awkward moment where I tell them I'm Catholic.
One tried to come back with, "But if you read Hitchens, you'll know it's Islam that's the real threat."
Then I pointed out that my stepmother is a Muslim.
Anyway, so far being upfront about my biases is filtering those guys out, but the only conversation it has attracted was from a guy whose profile entirely consisted of Dostoyevsky quotes, and all he wanted to talk about was the inherent paradox of being religious and feminist. Since I don't see a paradox, this was difficult.
That's a full on first line: opinionated left-wing feminist Catholic nerd.
Definitely not for me ma chérie.
So far I've resisted the urge to reply, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED", or pointing out that he needs a comma after "me", or, indeed, replying at all.
The whole point of that first line is that in my experience with online dating, I tend to make contact with seemingly nice men, and we bond over our left-wing politics and feminism and nerdery, and then they start telling me how great Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are. And then there's the awkward moment where I tell them I'm Catholic.
One tried to come back with, "But if you read Hitchens, you'll know it's Islam that's the real threat."
Then I pointed out that my stepmother is a Muslim.
Anyway, so far being upfront about my biases is filtering those guys out, but the only conversation it has attracted was from a guy whose profile entirely consisted of Dostoyevsky quotes, and all he wanted to talk about was the inherent paradox of being religious and feminist. Since I don't see a paradox, this was difficult.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 09:46 pm (UTC)Hope you start to have some better luck!
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-06 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 09:55 pm (UTC)Knew there was a reason you were on my flist! ♥
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:10 pm (UTC)I know some people who've found great partners on dating websites! And one on Craigslist. :) Sorry you're having to sift through these d-bags, and I hope your first line will *attract* someone great as well as filter out most of these dudes.
Also, I'm agnostic, but Hitchens and Dawkins? No thanks. (Un?)holier-than-thou atheists are so obnoxious.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:19 pm (UTC)Perfect!
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:21 pm (UTC)I had a couple of nice relationships through OK Cupid; it just takes sifting.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:28 pm (UTC)I'm getting this little...eyelid twitch. Ack. Did this dude also believe that women are inherently unfunny? Because his idol Hitchens said that, too. My parents sometimes nudge me towards dating sites, but wow, does it sound unfun to explain my Jewish atheist ass to them.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-02 11:30 pm (UTC)*snickers* That is a GREAT first line. And don't lose hope! I met another of your kind just last Saturday! Granted, he lives in Boston, and I've no idea whether he's ever checked out OK Cupid....
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 12:18 am (UTC)I'm an atheist, and I still would rather avoid conversations with anyone who wants to hold forth on how great Christopher Hitchens is.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 03:16 am (UTC)Well said.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 12:30 am (UTC)In any case, there are some nice folks in the slush pile... but it's not a small slush pile.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 03:18 am (UTC)Do not resist this urge. It is a good urge. Well, possibly not a good urge, but an amusing one. After all, it is true, because the mission of your first line is to weed out idiots like him.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 03:23 am (UTC)Uhm, dude, *you* visited *her* profile. Just move along, Narcissus. Just move along.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 10:34 am (UTC)And as someone who is--not uncritically--fond of Dostoyevsky, it surprises me considerably less than I would like that somebody whose profile is entirely composed of quotes from his work would make presumptuous and uncalled-for assumptions about what is and isn't paradoxical.
Regarding Messrs Dawkins and Hitchens: It's always exhausting when an apparent political kindred spirit turns out to have what one considers questionable views on religion, and vice-versa. I've had that exact same rude awakening, regarding those exact same people (and the staggeringly, I'm almost tempted to say uniquely but that isn't really the case, execrable Sam Harris), more than once. And it isn't as if their views on religion are the only reason one would have a problem with these people either! Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are, themselves, religious quasi-kindred spirits with questionable views on politics for several of my less piously-inclined friends.
*I vaguely recall OK Cupid uses a less clinical-sounding term than compatibility, but I forget what it is if so.
ETA: Sorry I've edited this so many times; it's a time of day when I should probably not be awake.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 10:38 am (UTC)(Edit: that's regarding the first dude. The second dude, I just...I got nothing.)
This really isn't useful for you, but I feel it's an interesting data point: I found that the tenor of my communications improved dramatically when I removed "guys" from the "Interested In" options, and just left it as "girls". I actually encountered a few other women who'd had the same experience -- they were bi, but found that the only way the site was usable for them was if they used it exclusively to meet women. I totally salute straight women who use the site, oof.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 01:39 pm (UTC)(I'm only interested in women, and I've vaguely considered online dating at times, although it probably doesn't work well if you change countries every couple of years.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 11:44 am (UTC)And paradox guy has clearly never met any nuns, wow.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 08:17 pm (UTC)laugh or want to hit them with a giant anime mallet. :-)
FairladyZ2005
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 08:36 pm (UTC)FairladyZ2005
no subject
Date: 2013-01-04 03:15 am (UTC)I assume you've seen Nice Guys of OK Cupid?
no subject
Date: 2013-01-04 05:19 am (UTC)I mean, it might be a stumbling block for me, if I were into you in that way.Also I thought you were possibly a lesbian.Really, I had no idea you were Catholic. It doesn't offend me or anything, some of the nicest, coolest people I know are Catholic. I just hadn't really noticed.
True story, my old college advisor, a Catholic, was surprised I was raised evangelical Protestant. "I assumed you were a Catholic, you seemed more sophisticated." I said I was really more an agnostic. "Well, aren't we all."
no subject
Date: 2013-01-04 05:33 pm (UTC)Heh. Don't consider it to be off-putting, though. Try to see it as separating the wheat from the chaff or the sheep from the goats. :P
Also, I've decided that, should I ever try online dating, my profile would totally elaborate on my three Fs: fangirling, fatness, and feminism. I suppose that serves as a similar deterrent.