The Wrong About Companions Bingo Card
Jan. 19th, 2013 01:26 pmLook, I just reached a tipping point, okay?
All of these are things I've seen actual people say about actual companions. Sometimes in what are ostensibly feminist critiques. Left out due to lack of space: victim, actress is responsible for sexism, a few others.
"Agency" is included because in the last couple of years I've seen it being chucked around with abandon, regardless of situation, context, or, indeed, whether or not a character has any agency. This is a problem across fandoms, not just Doctor Who, but the result is that it's become as meaningless to me as labeling a character a Mary Sue or a Strong Female Character. ("Fridged" is going the same way, especially after complaints that Sophie was fridged in "Closing Time" because she ... went on a holiday ... and came back alive and happy at the end.)
All of these are things I've seen actual people say about actual companions. Sometimes in what are ostensibly feminist critiques. Left out due to lack of space: victim, actress is responsible for sexism, a few others.
"Agency" is included because in the last couple of years I've seen it being chucked around with abandon, regardless of situation, context, or, indeed, whether or not a character has any agency. This is a problem across fandoms, not just Doctor Who, but the result is that it's become as meaningless to me as labeling a character a Mary Sue or a Strong Female Character. ("Fridged" is going the same way, especially after complaints that Sophie was fridged in "Closing Time" because she ... went on a holiday ... and came back alive and happy at the end.)

no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:43 am (UTC)*headdesks*
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 04:04 am (UTC)It's like an internet law - any terms created for feminist critique of how female characters are written will inevitably be used by fandom to trash every female character. (A big part of this is falsely equating "It's bad if all or a disproportionate amount of female characters were written like this" with "Anytime a female character is written like this, it's bad!")
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 05:55 am (UTC)Watson. Is right. There.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:07 am (UTC)(I got into this whole thing where someone was starting with the perfectly legit point that Tolkien doesn't have many female characters, and someone countered with the completely irrelevant "But Eowyn is awesome!" and then it turned into a trashing of Eowyn, and the Things You Should Never Write Female Characters Doing List now apparently includes both "Typically feminine stuff like falling for men and getting married" and "Stuff that's not typically feminine like going to war and being good in battle".)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:14 am (UTC)(In fact, I saw a post on Tumblr about how Moffat needs to go write submarine dramas or something, and that way there won't be any women for him to "mess up". I didn't bother pointing out that submarine dramas come with women these days.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:28 am (UTC)(Seriously people, it's not hard. Stuff can be problematic when it's replicated massively on an industry-wide scale and perfectly acceptable in one particular work. In fact, anything specific enough to make for an actual character would be problematic if it was presented as the only image of People Like That.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:05 pm (UTC)(I remember The Sarah Connor Chronicles had Australian Stephanie Jacobs playing a former submarine commander, because Australia is the only country that allows women to serve on nuclear subs. Has that changed?)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 03:37 pm (UTC)Everyone should be white, male, and speak in RP, so minority can be "messed up." Because poor representation, or just being written like a flawed character, is worse than no representation at all.
...
At least, that's the impression of social justice fandom I got some time back. I wonder what's really going on with some people.
rereads: Oh, great, I'm turning into an old guy who repeats himself.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 09:23 pm (UTC)(Which explains to some extent why Holmes is so determined to not read and eventually destroy them. He's in too much pain to recognise them as the clues that they are.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 01:18 pm (UTC)(I've seen this for Martha, Amy and River.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:06 pm (UTC):p
Date: 2013-01-20 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:07 pm (UTC)That flowchart was the actual worst.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:44 pm (UTC)It's a shame, because I want to keep talking about fridging - Like, f'r instance IRENE ADLER, but everyone has ruined it.
(Also: AGENCY. As in "Rapunzel didn't have any agency in Tangled." WHAT MOVIE WERE THEY WATCHING?)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 10:08 pm (UTC)Sorry, Romana, Rodan, Flavia, the Inquisitor. No existence for you!
no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 03:46 am (UTC)Um, what?
no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-20 10:07 pm (UTC)FairladyZ2005