lizbee: A sketch of myself (DW: Romana - radical Pythian)
[personal profile] lizbee
Look, I just reached a tipping point, okay?

 photo companionbingo_zpsfd1b826f.png


All of these are things I've seen actual people say about actual companions.  Sometimes in what are ostensibly feminist critiques.  Left out due to lack of space: victim, actress is responsible for sexism, a few others. 

"Agency" is included because in the last couple of years I've seen it being chucked around with abandon, regardless of situation, context, or, indeed, whether or not a character has any agency.  This is a problem across fandoms, not just Doctor Who, but the result is that it's become as meaningless to me as labeling a character a Mary Sue or a Strong Female Character.  ("Fridged" is going the same way, especially after complaints that Sophie was fridged in "Closing Time" because she ... went on a holiday ... and came back alive and happy at the end.)

Date: 2013-01-19 03:17 am (UTC)
nonelvis: (DW Amy apple)
From: [personal profile] nonelvis
The truly sad thing is I'll bet it didn't take you more than a few minutes to come up with a full card and some extra wrongness to spare.

Date: 2013-01-19 03:43 am (UTC)
ladymercury_10: (Rory)
From: [personal profile] ladymercury_10
Wow, fandom. I can see why that would be a tipping point.

*headdesks*

Date: 2013-01-19 04:04 am (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
This is a problem across fandoms, not just Doctor Who, but the result is that it's become as meaningless to me as labeling a character a Mary Sue or a Strong Female Character. ("Fridged" is going the same way, especially after complaints that Sophie was fridged in "Closing Time" because she ... went on a holiday ... and came back alive and happy at the end.)

It's like an internet law - any terms created for feminist critique of how female characters are written will inevitably be used by fandom to trash every female character. (A big part of this is falsely equating "It's bad if all or a disproportionate amount of female characters were written like this" with "Anytime a female character is written like this, it's bad!")

Date: 2013-01-19 06:07 am (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
Do they not consider her strong, or have they completely forgotten about her?

(I got into this whole thing where someone was starting with the perfectly legit point that Tolkien doesn't have many female characters, and someone countered with the completely irrelevant "But Eowyn is awesome!" and then it turned into a trashing of Eowyn, and the Things You Should Never Write Female Characters Doing List now apparently includes both "Typically feminine stuff like falling for men and getting married" and "Stuff that's not typically feminine like going to war and being good in battle".)

Date: 2013-01-19 06:28 am (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
Looking at fandom and the weird twists they put on social justice stuff, I get the impression that the most enlightened response is to just not write anything ever, lest you either under-represent, over-represent, or misrepresent any particular group.

(Seriously people, it's not hard. Stuff can be problematic when it's replicated massively on an industry-wide scale and perfectly acceptable in one particular work. In fact, anything specific enough to make for an actual character would be problematic if it was presented as the only image of People Like That.)

Date: 2013-01-19 06:27 pm (UTC)
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)
From: [personal profile] recessional
No, because then you're "giving up" and "whining" about how life is too hard for you, you evil privileged person you.

Date: 2013-01-19 06:28 pm (UTC)
ide_cyan: Dalbello peering into a screen (Default)
From: [personal profile] ide_cyan
...and more than just one submarine drama: Last Resort, too, has female characters working aboard a submarine.

Date: 2013-01-20 03:37 pm (UTC)
philippos42: (green)
From: [personal profile] philippos42
No, no, representation of outsiders is always bad one way or another. Also, no one should have accents or dialects.

Everyone should be white, male, and speak in RP, so minority can be "messed up." Because poor representation, or just being written like a flawed character, is worse than no representation at all.

...

At least, that's the impression of social justice fandom I got some time back. I wonder what's really going on with some people.

rereads: Oh, great, I'm turning into an old guy who repeats himself.
Edited Date: 2013-01-20 03:45 pm (UTC)

Date: 2013-01-19 09:59 am (UTC)
jesuswasbatman: (bitch please (nostalgia))
From: [personal profile] jesuswasbatman
No, I think it's the odd phenomenon of allegedly-feminist fan critics arguing that women only matter if they're potential love interests for the protagonist.

Date: 2013-01-19 12:37 pm (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
But isn't that the opposite of feminism?

Date: 2013-01-19 01:37 pm (UTC)
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
From: [personal profile] chocolatepot
I think the argument is that only love interests count because to the writer and the unenlightened audience, those are the only female characters that matter, so writers need to do their feminist stuff with them to prove they really mean it.

Date: 2013-01-19 02:23 pm (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
Ah, so they're making condescending assumptions about the audience as a justification for replicating the sexist "Women's importance is determined by the importance of the men who want them romantically" idea! That's understandable, in kind of a depressing way.

Date: 2013-01-19 06:13 pm (UTC)
sabra_n: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sabra_n
Oh, kids. Irene cannot have been fridged because there's no way the show would kill her without ever really using her.

Date: 2013-01-19 10:09 pm (UTC)
sabra_n: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sabra_n
Oh, I'd forgotten about the letters! I should watch that ep again...

Date: 2013-01-19 01:18 pm (UTC)
drakyndra: OH NOES SPOILERS AHEAD! (Spoilers!)
From: [personal profile] drakyndra
I think my favourite is complaining about a specific companion lacks development or agency because "their entire character revolves around the Doctor", and then calling the same companion mean or heartless because they prioritised their own desires over spending the rest of their life nannying the Doctor's manpain.

(I've seen this for Martha, Amy and River.)

:p

Date: 2013-01-20 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] philippos42
Of course you're bad you're not sexy like David Tennant get out of my way strumpet you're blocking the pretty.

Date: 2013-01-19 03:06 pm (UTC)
nam_jai: (Charmed sisters)
From: [personal profile] nam_jai
I think "fridged" is already there, and that gloriously ludicrous "Closing Time" example confirms my opinion. I've thought so ever since that Female Character Flowchart that (for feminism's sake, of course!) dismissed every female character ever, where any dead female character came to her flowchart end on the "Fridged Stuffing" circle.

Date: 2013-01-19 03:20 pm (UTC)
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
From: [personal profile] chocolatepot
THAT FLOWCHART. It came to mind the other day for some reason and I got all irritated. Honestly, if they had just struck off that top row and been like, "this is a map of tropes for female characters" they would have been fine, I have no idea who thought it would be great to say that all of the example characters they used were sexist cardboard stereotypes.

Date: 2013-01-19 04:00 pm (UTC)
nam_jai: (AtLA dancing dragons)
From: [personal profile] nam_jai
When it first came out, I hadn't watched Avatar: The Last Airbender yet, but after I had, at some point I came across the flowchart again, and got to be irritated all afresh: "Azula? You singled out Azula? Bad flowchart! Bad!"

Date: 2013-01-19 10:15 pm (UTC)
nam_jai: (AtLA dancing dragons)
From: [personal profile] nam_jai
I had to go look at the thing again this morning, so I can report: The flowchart considered her "sexualized" but her classification was not "Femme Fatale"; she was "Girl Hitler."

Date: 2013-01-19 03:33 pm (UTC)
wolfy_writing: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolfy_writing
I am so sick of "Female+dead=fridged". (Or "Female+dead+important male character shows any signs of caring=fridged".) If you're going to write female characters with anything close to the range and depth traditionally given to male characters, some of them are going to die (or suffer equally nasty fates), and if you strip all complexity and nuance from the idea of fridging, you end up with some rule saying that female characters have to be either impervious to harm or not valued by the guys in the story. (Or, if you take the "Closing Time" example at all seriously, a rule which says female characters, once introduced, can never be removed from the narrative in any way, even temporarily.)

Date: 2013-01-19 03:44 pm (UTC)
innerbrat: (black canary)
From: [personal profile] innerbrat
And sometimes a woman is legitimately fridged and it's STILL a good story! (YMMV on that one, and I'm not giving examples, because way subjective.)

It's a shame, because I want to keep talking about fridging - Like, f'r instance IRENE ADLER, but everyone has ruined it.

(Also: AGENCY. As in "Rapunzel didn't have any agency in Tangled." WHAT MOVIE WERE THEY WATCHING?)

Date: 2013-01-20 05:48 am (UTC)
skywaterblue: (death)
From: [personal profile] skywaterblue
Ugh. Last example is crazy making.

Date: 2013-01-19 03:56 pm (UTC)
nam_jai: (DW Romana)
From: [personal profile] nam_jai
It doesn't even need to be a guy mourning her -- I saw complaints following the pilot of the CW's Beauty and Beast that the female protagonist's mother was fridged. Now, I haven't watched that show beyond the pilot, so I can neither defend nor criticize how it's handled this plot point overall, but I saw nothing inherently wrong or unfeminist with having this woman be motivated by the unsolved murder of her mother.

Date: 2013-01-19 08:54 pm (UTC)
nostalgia: (ten/martha always on my mind)
From: [personal profile] nostalgia
ALL OF GALLIFREY IS DEAD AND HALF OF THEM MUST OF BEEN WOMEN THEREFORE FRIDGING ON AN EPIC SCALE OH NOES!

Date: 2013-01-19 11:19 pm (UTC)
nostalgia: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nostalgia
THat is a strange argument.

Date: 2013-01-20 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] philippos42
Because we've seen so many male Time Lords.

Date: 2013-01-20 03:46 am (UTC)
kerravonsen: Avon: I see stupid people (I-see-stupid-people)
From: [personal profile] kerravonsen
complaints that Sophie was fridged in "Closing Time" because she ... went on a holiday ... and came back alive and happy at the end.

Um, what?

Date: 2013-01-20 08:56 pm (UTC)
lyssie: (Jo Grant blows up daleks)
From: [personal profile] lyssie
I have this strange urge to use that card as fic prompts and attempt to get Bingo while writing the companions. hrm. (miniskirted screamers, especially)

Date: 2013-01-20 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think my Americanism is showing. I had to look up what "chav" means. And I really haven't heard the word "agency" used in that fashion either before. So I was kinda confused. But I find the rest of your bingo card to be sad but true in terms of people complaining.

FairladyZ2005

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 07:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios