Kids today, amiright?
Jun. 2nd, 2013 09:09 amFinding myself awake at 4 am this morning, I checked my email. I had two pieces of anonymous feedback on an Avatar fic I posted ... last year? The year before? Anyway, when I woke up again at 7, I had two more reviews from the same anon:

They go from the bottom up.
First, I had to ask what "lemons" means. (It's a now out-of-vogue term for smut, apparently, mostly popular in anime fandoms.)
Sadly, there's no way of communicating with this anonymouse. Otherwise, I would say the following:
1. The fic is ended. It had a high rating for violence and an arranged underage marriage. Nowhere did I promise "lemons".
2. You're right, that was a weak ending. But not because of the lack of citrus fruit. Even if I did a "remake", it wouldn't be smutty.
3. I was not aware that having over 20 reviews meant I was now taking orders.
4. FF.net doesn't even allow explicit fic!
5. Aang is, like, 13 in this fic! Are you some kind of pervert?

They go from the bottom up.
First, I had to ask what "lemons" means. (It's a now out-of-vogue term for smut, apparently, mostly popular in anime fandoms.)
Sadly, there's no way of communicating with this anonymouse. Otherwise, I would say the following:
1. The fic is ended. It had a high rating for violence and an arranged underage marriage. Nowhere did I promise "lemons".
2. You're right, that was a weak ending. But not because of the lack of citrus fruit. Even if I did a "remake", it wouldn't be smutty.
3. I was not aware that having over 20 reviews meant I was now taking orders.
4. FF.net doesn't even allow explicit fic!
5. Aang is, like, 13 in this fic! Are you some kind of pervert?
no subject
Date: 2013-06-01 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-01 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-01 11:34 pm (UTC)And, if I'm remembering correctly, sometimes people would use orange if it was very mild kissing and the like.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-01 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-01 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 01:02 pm (UTC)And Avatar is often miscategorised as an anime, so that's probably where the citrus fruit came from.
From the POV of a twelve-year old, mind.
XWA
no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 09:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 04:05 am (UTC)I'd always had the vague impression that is was done more among anime fans than English-language media fans, but perhaps that's incorrect. ^^;
no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 11:29 am (UTC)It still is visible in anime fandoms - (see the GWAddiction fanfic archive), and I do think that for fans who had come from those times and continue on in similar anime fandoms, they would continue to use that ratings.
Western type fandoms do not use it.
(Hi! reading from a friend of a friend's dwroll!)
no subject
Date: 2013-06-02 09:40 pm (UTC)Lies and slander. It was all over Harry Potter fandom once upon a time. Takes me back.
Dear God, ff.net reviewers seem to be uncommonly entitled as a whole.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-03 08:22 pm (UTC)I kind of wish that violence had such a nuanced labeling system. It's be cool, we could say "Warning for Pixie Sticks" when people in the story get stabbed, "Warning for Bubble Gum" when the story only contains Saving Private Ryan-type war violence, "Warning for Cotton Candy" when the violence is hardcore torture stuff, and even "Warning for Kit Kat Bar" when the violence is bone-specific martial arts injuries.