Star Trek: Picard 1.01 - "Remembrance"
Jan. 24th, 2020 11:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have watched the thing!
My initial reaction was, THAT WAS GREAT, I LOVE IT, I JUST HAVE SOME MINOR QUIBBLES!
Then my quibbles grew, eg:
These problems aside, THAT WAS GREAT, I LOVE IT. On a purely contrarian note, I really enjoy that Modern Trek is all about brilliant female relatives of iconic male characters. And Brent Spiner's scenes were incredibly effective and affecting.
(I feel like Lal needed a more overt shoutout? I realise that this show needs to be accessible to new viewers, and also "The Offspring" is just an inferior version of "The Measure of a Man", but still!)
(Lore ... probably also needed a shoutout. I guess.)
I'm not into the whole synths storyline so far -- not least because it feels like Discovery has also touched on this, but the two series aren't quite in conversation with each other. And where do sentient holograms fit in? Was Maddox and his team really just building an army of synthetic beings in a factory? That seems ... ethically problematic.
(As does using Data's positrons to create posthumous offspring. Maybe Data arranged for that in his will? I've seen Star Trek, so I assume that Maddox is hanging out on an isolated planet with an inappropriately young wife, doing Mad Science, but maybe this whole thing with Dahj and Soji is actually just his self/Data babyfic gone too far.)
BUT I can easily buy that a lot of Federation citizens are prejudiced against synthetic life forms, even without the whole "destroyed Mars" business.
(Guys, they destroyed Mars.)
Like, consider the way Pulaski treated Data; the way a lot of people -- Voyager's crew, at first, but also Beverly -- treat the EMH. So that makes sense to me! But I have questions about ... look, Cylons? Again?
(I stand by my position that Michael Chabon is not necessarily a good or original writer of science fiction. Or women. Or women in science fiction.)
My initial reaction was, THAT WAS GREAT, I LOVE IT, I JUST HAVE SOME MINOR QUIBBLES!
Then my quibbles grew, eg:
- we have two characters played by black people; one is unceremoniously killed, the other is patronised by Picard in a scene which reminded me of Babylon 5 (and not in a good way)
- this is literally the second Trek premiere which presents an Asian woman as a lead, then kills her and subs in an identical replacement?
- like, really??????
- I can't believe we're doing Cylons
- there were a lot of women in this episode, but they didn't speak to each other
- this is not a show about relationships, but so far I'm seeing a lot of heterosexuality
These problems aside, THAT WAS GREAT, I LOVE IT. On a purely contrarian note, I really enjoy that Modern Trek is all about brilliant female relatives of iconic male characters. And Brent Spiner's scenes were incredibly effective and affecting.
(I feel like Lal needed a more overt shoutout? I realise that this show needs to be accessible to new viewers, and also "The Offspring" is just an inferior version of "The Measure of a Man", but still!)
(Lore ... probably also needed a shoutout. I guess.)
I'm not into the whole synths storyline so far -- not least because it feels like Discovery has also touched on this, but the two series aren't quite in conversation with each other. And where do sentient holograms fit in? Was Maddox and his team really just building an army of synthetic beings in a factory? That seems ... ethically problematic.
(As does using Data's positrons to create posthumous offspring. Maybe Data arranged for that in his will? I've seen Star Trek, so I assume that Maddox is hanging out on an isolated planet with an inappropriately young wife, doing Mad Science, but maybe this whole thing with Dahj and Soji is actually just his self/Data babyfic gone too far.)
BUT I can easily buy that a lot of Federation citizens are prejudiced against synthetic life forms, even without the whole "destroyed Mars" business.
(Guys, they destroyed Mars.)
Like, consider the way Pulaski treated Data; the way a lot of people -- Voyager's crew, at first, but also Beverly -- treat the EMH. So that makes sense to me! But I have questions about ... look, Cylons? Again?
(I stand by my position that Michael Chabon is not necessarily a good or original writer of science fiction. Or women. Or women in science fiction.)
no subject
Date: 2020-01-24 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2020-01-24 01:52 am (UTC)Daj’s mom was in her mind, yes? I’m wondering why she didn’t mention her sister... if she even knows, maybe Soji knew about daj, but Daj didn’t know about her (like Lore/Data) but The way they talked about it they would have been created at the same time.
I think in measure of a man data consented to leave his body for science, but I haven’t watched it in a year or two so may be misremembering.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2020-01-24 09:24 am (UTC)But on the whole - I'm in, albeit slightly more cautiously than I'd anticipated. It was an exposition-heavy ep, so hopefully now that the scene is set we can just get on with the plot.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2020-01-24 09:36 pm (UTC)PICARD: AMAZING, WONDERFUL, GREAT
Treatment of women and PoC: :-//////
Background plot and setup, and stuff about synths: wha? And did they really want to make this so dependent on Nemesis? I couldn't even remember whether or not I had seen Nemesis. That was annoying.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 06:09 am (UTC)I think they did the best possible job they could getting Nemesis and Star Trek 2009 to make sense in the main timeline, and the Federation's treatment of Data, of holograms, and of genetically engineered people makes their attitude towards "synthetics" very plausible. That said, I'm extremely intrigued by the fact that the AI researcher is like "the synths that destroyed Mars came out of this lab" and yet she still has a job? Obviously a lot to unpack with her.
The Mars attack thing has reminded me powerfully of B5 since I saw "Children of Mars" (come on, the synth ships in there look quite a lot like Shadow vessels) and I am still powerfully reminded of B5 in general, especially since there's now a kind of narrative equivalence between Mars and Romulus. Having just rewatched Generations, though, where the media also get very short shrift, I don't think we need to go to B5 for Picard lecturing the anchor, we can stay in Trek just fine.
The artificial intelligence thing in general does feel awkward, given that Discovery just spent a whole season on it and jumped to the 29thC to avoid a very evil artificial intelligence. As with some of the other wince-worthy bits you point out, you can tell this show came out of the same brain trust, Michael Chabon (who I'm not really a fan of) notwithstanding.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2020-01-28 04:53 pm (UTC)I wondered about sentient holograms too. Maybe that'll get a mention eventually. (Seven would be well-positioned to point it out!) Also, like, the fact that it seems like Starfleet at one point signed off on the plan to create a race of android slaves to do dirty work... you know, the very thing that the events of Measure of a Man was supposed to prevent? But apparently they weren't as advanced as Data. But then why did they rebel (if that's what happened)?
I also was a bit taken aback that I was expected to remember whatever the hell happened in Nemesis, which I have not seen since the day it was released. I guess they couldn't really help it, though, if they wanted to make Picard's friendship with Data a big part of the show (which I do think was a great choice). And really I'm not at all opposed to taking one of the less successful parts of canon and making some tasty lemonade out of those lemons.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-29 05:13 am (UTC)Alas, I did not have the 'it was great I loved it' bit. I'm starting to think I'm just broken about fandom, lately. I want to love it. I just... can't seem to.
And yeah, it's pretty much never a good idea when a writer of literary fiction does sci-fi. They always wind up thinking they've invented something Very Clever that the genre's actually been doing since, like, forever.