Two (2) books were read this week
Jun. 14th, 2023 12:41 pmFirst, I finished reading the Succession scripts, and they remained excellent.
I've been a Greg Skeptic for a couple of seasons, and was unsurprised to realise that by the end of season 1, the character on paper was far more complex than Nicholas Braun was conveying. He's a bit of a one note actor (that note: gormless), and I think by season 4, the writers understood that he was the weak link in the cast.
Second, I read Burn It Down by Maureen Ryan, her long-awaited deep dive into professional abuse in Hollywood. Of particular interest are the sections focusing on genre television -- the respective chapters on Lost and Sleepy Hollow, one that examines franchises in general, and a brief discussion of fandoms directing criticism and abuse at the wrong people -- The 100 fandom was cited as an example there, targeting a lowly production assistant because she was available, rather than the producers who actually made decisions.
The Lost chapter was excerpted in Vanity Fair, but I found the Sleepy Hollow stuff far more shocking -- I knew that Nicole Beharie had been labelled "difficult" and effectively blacklisted after she left that series, but I did not know there was a baseless rumour claiming she bit someone -- a claim so audacious, it seems impossible that anyone would take it at face value.
I very much enjoyed Burn It Down, and only take issue with Ryan's claim that Star Trek: Strange New Worlds is an example of good disability representation. (Tell me you're able-bodied without telling me, etc.)
After that, I had trouble settling down to a book. I started These Violent Delights by Chloe Gong, but after months of anticipation, I realised I wasn't in the mood. Like Six of Crows, it's a "YA" novel about characters who would make more sense if they were in their 20s or older, and also, I do not need to have the Kuomintang explained to me. (That might just be me, though, the Chinese Civil War and Revolution were a hyperfixation when I was 15.) So I returned it to the library, and will try again another time.
Now I'm reading The Storm Before The Storm: The Beginning of the End of the Roman Republic by Mike Duncan. I finally started watching HBO's Rome, which is both very good (in its depiction of the politics and the male characters and the masculine side of Roman culture) and unbelievably bad (every single woman). Unfortunately for everyone I know, my inner Classicist has been awakened, and so I'm rebuilding my general knowledge before I start doing deep dives into specific (female) lives.
Also, if HBO wants a 40-episode series about the Gracchi from the perspective of a Carthaginian slave, they should make a deal with the WGA then call me. I am now practically an expert in how not to be a showrunner, so I reckon I'll do an okay job.
I've been a Greg Skeptic for a couple of seasons, and was unsurprised to realise that by the end of season 1, the character on paper was far more complex than Nicholas Braun was conveying. He's a bit of a one note actor (that note: gormless), and I think by season 4, the writers understood that he was the weak link in the cast.
Second, I read Burn It Down by Maureen Ryan, her long-awaited deep dive into professional abuse in Hollywood. Of particular interest are the sections focusing on genre television -- the respective chapters on Lost and Sleepy Hollow, one that examines franchises in general, and a brief discussion of fandoms directing criticism and abuse at the wrong people -- The 100 fandom was cited as an example there, targeting a lowly production assistant because she was available, rather than the producers who actually made decisions.
The Lost chapter was excerpted in Vanity Fair, but I found the Sleepy Hollow stuff far more shocking -- I knew that Nicole Beharie had been labelled "difficult" and effectively blacklisted after she left that series, but I did not know there was a baseless rumour claiming she bit someone -- a claim so audacious, it seems impossible that anyone would take it at face value.
I very much enjoyed Burn It Down, and only take issue with Ryan's claim that Star Trek: Strange New Worlds is an example of good disability representation. (Tell me you're able-bodied without telling me, etc.)
After that, I had trouble settling down to a book. I started These Violent Delights by Chloe Gong, but after months of anticipation, I realised I wasn't in the mood. Like Six of Crows, it's a "YA" novel about characters who would make more sense if they were in their 20s or older, and also, I do not need to have the Kuomintang explained to me. (That might just be me, though, the Chinese Civil War and Revolution were a hyperfixation when I was 15.) So I returned it to the library, and will try again another time.
Now I'm reading The Storm Before The Storm: The Beginning of the End of the Roman Republic by Mike Duncan. I finally started watching HBO's Rome, which is both very good (in its depiction of the politics and the male characters and the masculine side of Roman culture) and unbelievably bad (every single woman). Unfortunately for everyone I know, my inner Classicist has been awakened, and so I'm rebuilding my general knowledge before I start doing deep dives into specific (female) lives.
Also, if HBO wants a 40-episode series about the Gracchi from the perspective of a Carthaginian slave, they should make a deal with the WGA then call me. I am now practically an expert in how not to be a showrunner, so I reckon I'll do an okay job.
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:29 am (UTC)(Maybe it's just good compared to *all other* star trek disability representation?)
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:53 am (UTC)It was a $30 ebook and worth every cent.
I wish I could say this is the case, but TNG had a blind character who did not once give his life for the able-bodied.
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:38 am (UTC)I can just imagine that they all said "Well, it's so ridiculous it almost has to be true, right?" in order to justify spreading it around without checking.
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 08:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 04:38 am (UTC)Oh, this is so interesting; thanks for sharing! Any chance you could describe what the character on the paper was vs what we saw on the screen? (I enjoyed Greg's role in the show well enough, but he generally struck me like he was intended to be goofy comic relief; I'm intrigued to hear it might've been intended to be more.)
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 08:07 am (UTC)a 40-episode series about the Gracchi from the perspective of a Carthaginian slave
YES PLEASE
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 03:46 pm (UTC)I would watch this! Or read it if it was a book.
If you enjoyed the political side of things in Rome, you might try finding Domina, a drama about the early life of Livia. It has probably the worst opening scene ever, but really does improve and obviously someone in the team really, really cared about Roman politics.
no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-06-14 10:08 pm (UTC)