Years ago in USA fandom (and maybe still, somewhere), "bonk" was one of the terms used when one wrote fanfic that abused a character and put him through hell. Hurt / comfort, though with a bit less comfort. I occasionally used the term, but the alternate sexual slang meaning made me quit. "Trashing" the character isn't so iffy; "bonking" is, to my ears.
I wouldn't go so far as to say hate, she just manages to hit a lot of my narrative and characterisation DO NOT WANT buttons a lot. And spent a lot of time in her season 3 commentaries Martha-bashing. Fail.
Every time I read anything about her or quoting her or whatever, I want to smack her in the face. Which, ok, isn't hate, really. But still. DO NOT WANT.
But I didn't mean to go all negative here. The point was unintentional dirty talk, which I am fully supportive of.
I couldn't say why, precisely, but she's the producer most likely to be found making fatuous and subtextually-classist remarks about how Rose is the most special. (She's also the one who had never seen Classic before she started work on DW.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:26 am (UTC)Still, LOL.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:28 am (UTC)I'm so sick of 21st century companions. Can we at least get someone not from London?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:29 am (UTC)We snicker when Americans talk about "rooting for their team", too.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:47 am (UTC)On the upside, I love when slang goes wrong. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:53 am (UTC)But I didn't mean to go all negative here. The point was unintentional dirty talk, which I am fully supportive of.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:29 am (UTC)...but WHY?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 06:37 am (UTC)Wtf? Good job supporting your own show.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:39 am (UTC)Okay, perhaps being dense here, but . . .
Susan, Jamie, Victoria, Zoe, Leela, Romana, Adric, Nyssa, and what his name again? Oh yeah, JACK.
And there may even be more because I can't be bothered to go to Wikipedia to check. (Not sure if Astrid counts, so I'll give Julie a pass on her.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:44 am (UTC)(...I'm now imagining Tegan making rude euphemisms and Five being oblivious.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 06:46 pm (UTC)I wonder if Traken had any.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 12:49 pm (UTC)And wait, she bashed Martha?
Unintentional dirtiness is always good, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:43 pm (UTC)Ewwwwww. Please leave immediately or sooner.